Al Gore vs Real Gore

Ravings from the Frothy Middle


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 March
2007 August
2007 July
2007 February
2007 January
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
Little Miss Attila
Dr. Forbush Thinks
Slashdot
Games Slashdot
User Friendly
James Randi
Snopes
Home of the Underdogs
The Sun Online

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


In which the middle-aged Peacenik mouths off about War Drones--and all the other things that make him cranky. Pnorny!

Mr Mahatma--who is a Mr in real life--lives in the valleys of Southern California with his wife, a herd of Dears, and an impressive collection of books. He is reachable at: littlemrmahatma@yahoo.com

All writings are copyrighted 2003-2008 and trademarked: Little Mr. Mahatma

Blogger Main Site


Still More Links:

Listed on BlogShares

Blogarama - The Blog Directory
Blogarama-Review My Site

IceRocket

LS Blogs

Blog Universe

Search For Blogs, Submit Blogs, The Ultimate Blog Directory

Blog Directory & Search engine

Site Meter


Al Gore vs Real Gore
05.27.04 (7:53 am)   [edit]
Not that I'm a big Al Gore fan but his little speech blasting Bush ("Real Gore") loudly proclaimed what many of us feel - that Bush et al have abused their positions, have abused the American Trust, and have made the world less safe. Critics of Gore cry that Gore should talk about honor when Clinton was getting some in that Oval Office.


But there's a big difference about getting head in the Oval Office versus lying to the American People and wasting *BILLIONS* of American dollars pursuing a private agenda.


In the '00 Election Bush criticised Clinton for spreading American forces too thin, of opening too many fronts. Bush said he wouldn't do that.


Bush get appointed President and starts his rampage of American pillaging when - BOOM! - 9/11. The entire world is shocked and outraged. Bush vows revenge on the terrorists behind the heinous act and the fingers point to Bin Laden. (Note, no mention of Bush ties to the bin Laden family).


Bin Laden apparently is hiding in Afghanistan supported by the Taliban. Bush says to the Taliban "GIve bin Laden up or else!" The Taliban tell Bush to do something nasty to a camel and in we go to Afghanistan. We have the support of the world as we go after the terrorist responsible for 9/11.


And this is where Bush blew it. He starts pointing fingers at Iraq. "Hussein has Weapons of Mass Destruction! He's going to use them against us ANY MOMENT NOW!!!" And with these cries of alarm Bush opens a second war in Iraq.


100 days later it's over. Hussein has been toppled. Life is good. The Iraqi people are ecstatic and quickly install a Democratic Government.


Except that last chunk of writing is pure fiction. It's not over. Hussein is gone - sure, but there's no Democracy in Iraq. The Weapons of Mass Destruction are like bin Laden, still not found and likely never to be found. Seemingly every day we have new revelations that Bush et al manipulated intelligence to fit their agenda.


We went from having the worlds sympathy to facing the worlds loathing, and we can't blame the French or the Russians. Only Bush and his cronies deserve the blame. By switching focus from bin Laden to Hussein, Bush lost the focus, lost the momentum, lost honor, lost credibility. He has brought disgrace to America and a new level of fear to the World. With the invasion of Iraq he has helped terrorist by giving them a cause to rally around. By not pursuing Bin Laden aggressively and persistently he has given the terrorists a leader to rally around. By taking the stance of proactively invading "threatening" countries Bush has placed America squarely as a target for the rest of the world, for if we have right to protect ourselves by aggression so does every other sovereign nation.


125,000 troops, $125 billions dollars, and Bush has no idea what he's doing in Iraq. You think that with those troops and that money, that Bin Laden could have caught by now?


And you have to wonder, if the EU and an Asian consortium demand that we disarm our WMDs or face military consequences would Bush comply? Would the King of the Hill allow himself to be brought down to the common level? Would the smirk and the arrogance disappear?

 


posted by: SamAdams (reply)
post date: 05.27.04 (9:19 am)

Yes... Bush is so arrogant, stupid and corrupt-- the 3 deadly sins in one crazy fuck!!! Good to see you, littlemrmahatma...

Your Name:


Your Comment:


More Links:

POLITICS:
Arianna
FactCheck.ORG not .COM
SpinSanity
Black Box Voting
OpenSecrets
Open The Government
AntiWar
Americans United for Separation of Church and State
Church of Critical Thinking
The New Enlightenment
Mother Jones
Reuters
Pravda

RELIGION:
Secular Web - Atheism
Skeptic's Annotated Bible and annotated Koran.
The Happy Heretic
Fallacies
The Skeptic's Dictionary
God of the Month
Religion Selector