 Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2008 November
2008 September
2008 March
2007 August
2007 July
2007 February
2007 January
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January
My Links
Little Miss Attila
Dr. Forbush Thinks
Slashdot
Games Slashdot
User Friendly
James Randi
Snopes
Home of the Underdogs
The Sun Online
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
In which the middle-aged Peacenik mouths off about War Drones--and all the other things that make him cranky. Pnorny!
Mr Mahatma--who is a Mr in real life--lives in the valleys of Southern California with his wife, a herd of Dears, and an impressive collection of books. He is reachable at: littlemrmahatma@yahoo.com
All writings are copyrighted 2003-2008 and trademarked: Little Mr. Mahatma
Blogger Main Site
Still More Links:

Blogarama-Review My Site
IceRocket
LS Blogs
Blog Universe
|
| Halliburden |
| 03.29.06 (9:19 am) [edit] |
What have we sayiong all along? Where's the accountability?
Halliburton overcharged for Iraq oil work: report
By Andrea Shalal-Esa Tue Mar 28, 7:30 PM ET
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Halliburton Co., the world's second largest oil
services company, repeatedly overcharged taxpayers and provided
substandard cost reports under a $1.2 billion contract to restore Iraq's
southern oil fields, according to a new report by U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman.
Waxman, a California Democrat, said Democratic staff members of the House
Committee on Government Reform examined a series of previously undisclosed
government audits and correspondence that criticized Halliburton's
performance under the "Restore Iraqi Oil 2" (RIO2) contract.
The documents, which cover the period from January 2004 to July 2005,
painted "an absolutely abysmal picture of Halliburton's RIO2 work" and cited
profound systemic problems, misleading and distorted cost reports, he said.
Halliburton, a Texas-based company formerly run by Vice President
Dick Cheney, dismissed the committee report as partisan and said it focused on
old issues with the two-year contract that have been resolved.
"After two years and from thousands of miles away, it is easy to criticize
decisions and actions that were based on urgent mission requirements and
severe time constraints," the company said in a statement.
Halliburton, the largest private contractor in Iraq, said the contract went through
"countless changes" and review by at least 15 different government
contracting officials.
Waxman, who has introduced legislation to limit sole-source contracts in the
future, said lawmakers did not know much about what had happened with the
contract since July 2005, adding: "From what we can see, major problems
remain."
Halliburton said its engineering and construction arm KBR, which is gearing up
for an initial public stock offering, had received 30 task orders under the
contract to date, for a total current value of nearly $750 million and work was
ongoing.
The Democratic report said that, in addition to the RIO 2 contract, Halliburton
was also paid $13.5 billion for providing troop support under a logistics
contract with the U.S. Army, and $2.4 billion under the original RIO contract to
import fuel into Iraq and rebuild Iraq oil infrastructure.
The Pentagon's Project and Contracting Office (PCO) found that Halliburton
repeatedly overcharged the government, Waxman said, citing the documents.
PCO put KBR on notice in January 2005 that it could cancel the contract for
cause. It lifted the notice six months later, saying KBR demonstrated
"adequate" compliance. In January, it exercised one of three one-year options
to extend the deal.
In one case, the agency said Halliburton tried to inflate cost estimates by $26
million. In another, it said Halliburton claimed costs for laying concrete pads and
footings that the Iraqi Oil Ministry had already installed.
The report said the same agency reported Halliburton was "accruing exorbitant
indirect costs at a rapid rate," while the Defense Contract Audit Agency
challenged $45 million of $365 million in costs as unreasonable or unsupported.
The PCO also cited "profound systemic problems" with Halliburton's cost
reporting and said some documents were stripped of information that would
allow tracking of details.
It said Halliburton's work under RIO 2 was 50 percent late and officials refused
to cooperate with oversight officials.
Halliburton, run by Cheney from 1995-2000, has been under scrutiny for its
contracts in Iraq.
We invaded Iraq because, in part according to Bush, Hussein failed to comply with U.N. inspectors. Here, Halliburton repeatedly fails to comply with the U.S. inspectors. Can we invade? How about sue, get our umpteen billions of dollars back, and get another tax cut?
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
|
More Links:
POLITICS:
Arianna
FactCheck.ORG not .COM
SpinSanity
Black Box Voting
OpenSecrets
Open The Government
AntiWar
Americans United for Separation of Church and State
Church of Critical Thinking
The New Enlightenment
Mother Jones
Reuters
Pravda
RELIGION:
Secular Web - Atheism
Skeptic's Annotated Bible and annotated Koran.
The Happy Heretic
Fallacies
The Skeptic's Dictionary
God of the Month
Religion Selector
|