|
To Snoop Or Not
Ravings from the Frothy Middle |
![]() Blog For Free! Archives Home 2008 November 2008 September 2008 March 2007 August 2007 July 2007 February 2007 January 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2005 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2004 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January My Links Little Miss Attila Dr. Forbush Thinks Slashdot Games Slashdot User Friendly James Randi Snopes Home of the Underdogs The Sun Online tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog In which the middle-aged Peacenik mouths off about War Drones--and all the other things that make him cranky. Pnorny! Mr Mahatma--who is a Mr in real life--lives in the valleys of Southern California with his wife, a herd of Dears, and an impressive collection of books. He is reachable at: littlemrmahatma@yahoo.com All writings are copyrighted 2003-2008 and trademarked: Little Mr. Mahatma
Blogger Main Site
|
posted by: red*ranger (reply) post date: 06.24.06 (3:23 am) ---what do you mean bush's corrupt policy? isn't it our rights to have taken counter-act*procedure against terrorism by ant means? the enemies didn't give us the choice to live in a society that is free...they took that Liberty from us!!! posted by: littlemrmahatma (reply) post date: 06.24.06 (6:40 pm) So explain to me exactly where Iraq fits in to 9/11? There's is and was no - make that, *NO* - conenction between the two. Iraq posed no, NO, *NO* threat to us in any way shape or form. Saudi Arabia was and is a known sponsor of terrorism. Iran was and is a known sponsor. North Korea poses a bigger threat with WMDs than Iraq ever did. (And, by the way, guess who supplied Iraq with all those yummy chemical weapons way back when? Reagan!) Our enemies have taken nothing from us. Our Government is the one who has suspended liberties because they're the ones who make and enforce policy. And the choices we have dwindle every time another corrupt Administration takes over. Bush happens to be the latest and worst in a long line. posted by: therealspartacus007 (reply) post date: 06.24.06 (9:06 pm) I think that they should snoop, but they should only snoop on suspects, not innocent Americans. We have a well established body of law to guide the government, but if they keep it secret, they can ignore the law. posted by: littlemrmahatma (reply) post date: 06.25.06 (5:25 pm) If you have a suspect first then you can follow a trail. But here the Government is trying to mine this insane amount of data looking for suspects. The problem is that they are more likely to find false-positives, that is, people who are innocent but pass their filters of guilt. With the way the Bush Admins run things they could grab these poor people without warrant and hold them indefinitely without telling them why or giving them any recourse to follow. It's called Big Brother 22 years later. Read the links for a much clearer explanation of the problems of data mining for terrorists. posted by: arhiderrr (reply) post date: 02.28.09 (4:54 am) Nice article posted by: arhiderrr (reply) post date: 02.28.09 (12:46 pm) Nice article posted by: arhiderrr (reply) post date: 02.28.09 (9:38 pm) Nice article posted by: arhiderrr (reply) post date: 03.01.09 (5:29 am) Nice article posted by: arhiderrr (reply) post date: 03.01.09 (1:23 pm) Nice article |
More Links:
POLITICS:
RELIGION:
|