Flag Desecration

Ravings from the Frothy Middle


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 November
2008 September
2008 March
2007 August
2007 July
2007 February
2007 January
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
Little Miss Attila
Dr. Forbush Thinks
Slashdot
Games Slashdot
User Friendly
James Randi
Snopes
Home of the Underdogs
The Sun Online

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


In which the middle-aged Peacenik mouths off about War Drones--and all the other things that make him cranky. Pnorny!

Mr Mahatma--who is a Mr in real life--lives in the valleys of Southern California with his wife, a herd of Dears, and an impressive collection of books. He is reachable at: littlemrmahatma@yahoo.com

All writings are copyrighted 2003-2008 and trademarked: Little Mr. Mahatma

Blogger Main Site


Still More Links:

Listed on BlogShares

Blogarama - The Blog Directory
Blogarama-Review My Site

IceRocket

LS Blogs

Blog Universe

Search For Blogs, Submit Blogs, The Ultimate Blog Directory

Blog Directory & Search engine

Site Meter


Flag Desecration
06.27.06 (7:48 pm)   [edit]
Finally some sanity in the Government, though just barely enough... Don't worry. I'm not posting the entire article. I had to end it on a certain quote.
Senate rejects flag desecration amendment

By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer 

WASHINGTON - A constitutional amendment to ban flag desecration died in a
Senate cliffhanger Tuesday, a single vote short of the support needed to send 
it to the states for ratification and four months before voters elect a new 
Congress.

The 66-34 tally in favor of the amendment was one less than the two-thirds 
required. The House surpassed that threshold last year, 286-130.

President Bush, who supports the amendment, called the failed vote 
unfortunate and commended Republicans and Democrats who voted to move 
the ratification process forward. In a statement, Bush said he continued to 
believe that "the American people deserve the opportunity to express their 
views on this important issue."

The proposed amendment, sponsored by Sen. Orrin Hatch (news, bio, voting 
record), R-Utah, read: "The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical 
desecration of the flag of the United States."

It represented Congress' response to Supreme Court rulings in 1989 and 1990 
that burning and other desecrations of the flag are protected as free speech 
by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Senate supporters said the flag amounts to a national monument in cloth that 
represents freedom and the sacrifice of American troops.

"Countless men and women have died defending that flag," said Majority 
Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., closing two days of debate. "It is but a small humble 
act for us to defend it."
So, Mr. Frist, if I'm travelling in South Dakota or some other forsaken place and I see someone desecrating the flag, can I kill them and claim defense? It's a flag, fer Pete's sake! A piece of cloth. It has no more inherent worth or value than a bible. If people like you are willing to kill someone over a piece of cloth or a book, then pity you. Countless mena and women have died because some politicians are stupid and self-serving. Should we dedicate libraries in their names?

Our Government needs to focus on important things like where the money is disappearing to in Iraq and why our President believes himself above the Law. Accountability is a much bigger issue than this time and money wasting Flag Amendment.

 


posted by: tfruge1 (reply)
post date: 06.28.06 (3:07 am)

Your last paragraph is very well written. I was pretty much thinking the exact same thing when i first hear about the flag amendment. I'm glad to see someone else who thinks that they are waisting their time trying to pass stupid amendments instead of trying to make laws to actually benefit the American public.

Your Name:


Your Comment:


More Links:

POLITICS:
Arianna
FactCheck.ORG not .COM
SpinSanity
Black Box Voting
OpenSecrets
Open The Government
AntiWar
Americans United for Separation of Church and State
Church of Critical Thinking
The New Enlightenment
Mother Jones
Reuters
Pravda

RELIGION:
Secular Web - Atheism
Skeptic's Annotated Bible and annotated Koran.
The Happy Heretic
Fallacies
The Skeptic's Dictionary
God of the Month
Religion Selector