3 Democrats - 1 Office

Ravings from the Frothy Middle


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 March
2007 August
2007 July
2007 February
2007 January
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
Little Miss Attila
Dr. Forbush Thinks
Slashdot
Games Slashdot
User Friendly
James Randi
Snopes
Home of the Underdogs
The Sun Online

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


In which the middle-aged Peacenik mouths off about War Drones--and all the other things that make him cranky. Pnorny!

Mr Mahatma--who is a Mr in real life--lives in the valleys of Southern California with his wife, a herd of Dears, and an impressive collection of books. He is reachable at: littlemrmahatma@yahoo.com

All writings are copyrighted 2003-2008 and trademarked: Little Mr. Mahatma

Blogger Main Site


Still More Links:

Listed on BlogShares

Blogarama - The Blog Directory
Blogarama-Review My Site

IceRocket

LS Blogs

Blog Universe

Search For Blogs, Submit Blogs, The Ultimate Blog Directory

Blog Directory & Search engine

Site Meter


3 Democrats - 1 Office
02.23.07 (8:25 am)   [edit]
I think it's safe and fair to say that there are only three viable Democratic candidates for 2008: Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards. I don't like HIllary because she's too political. Everything she says and does is measured in political brownie points. She, the person, doesn't come through. For her, though, is that she has the most political experience of the three. If she won the candidacy, how long before jokes about blue dresses or blue jeans popped up?

Obama is a ray of light. He speaks well and has undeniable charisma. He doesn't have the political experience of the other two. The one time on TV I heard him speak, he impressed me with his eloquence but lost me when he brought religion into his speech.

Edwards is an intelligent speaker though not as eloquent as Obama. He was on one of those Sunday morning news shows and he laid out a plan for Iraq that was insightful. He gave details and reasons for actions. My problem with him is, simply, he doesn't have the Presidential Stature. Hillary and Barack have the composure. Edwards is more VP material.

Maybe an Obama/Edwards or Clinton/Edwards ticket would do it. What I'd like to see in any case is a candidate who doesn't drag religion into politics. Better would be a candidate who declares that religion shouldn't be a part of politics and acts accordingly. I'd like a candidate who recognizes that our Government is not beholden to Corporate America but to the Real America, the ordinary people who put them in power. I'd like a candidate with the intelligence to weigh decisions, not act from the gut like our current President. I'd like a candidate who can speak in complete sentences, without sound bites or pre-written material. I'd like a candidate who has the guts to admit mistakes and not slough off past errors as childish mistakes. I'd like a candidate who understands that our country, great as it is, doesn't rule the world nor should it try to - Diplomacy has to be a vital tool in the political kit.

I'd like a candidate, a President, who doesn't make me feel like I need to bathe after seeing him or her, someone for whom we don't have to apologize.

 


posted by: sos (reply)
post date: 02.24.07 (12:18 am)

I'd like a candidate who isn't completely full of bovine excrement. Sadly there isn't one running to vote for.



posted by: littlemrmahatma (reply)
post date: 02.24.07 (9:01 pm)

I feel that if Obama gets a decent amount of steam the Republicans will somehow knock him down with the slogan "From Osama to Obama".

It's pathetic and sickening that the Republicans previously worked the moral high ground yet proved themselves a collection of immoral louts. Now the Democrats are trying to take a moral high ground with their collective attempt at "clean campaigning". Problem is, it won't work against dirty campaigning. Thanks in part to "No Child Left Behind" and other successful efforts to lower education standards, we have a nation of thoughtless sheep that quickly baa-baa in to line when the smear campaigns hit. That's why, in part, a dumb-s__t like Bush got the Presidency (that and his connections).

Pity America and keep up the effort to make it better.



posted by: sos (reply)
post date: 02.26.07 (4:59 pm)

If the democrats are looking for the moral high ground they got a long, lohg way to go I'm afraid. From Pelosi's special exclusion for business's in her district from the Democrats own increase of the minimum wage, Al Gore's touting of energy conservation while his mansion uses almost 20 timems that of a normal household, Hillary Clinton's multitude of scandals and of course almost everything John Kerry say's when he opens his mouth I'm afraid the Dem's have no more claim on the moral high ground than the Republican's, and that doesn't look as if it's going to change anytime soon.

As to the educational system, it's a mess... but in all fairness you can't blame no child left behind or any other republican sponsered legislation for that, it's been a mess for years and it is a bastion of the Left wing, not the right wing. If you can blame the right wing for anything that concerns the education system it's for not doing more to fix it when they were in power.

As for America, I don't pity my country or my countrymen for that matter. As a democracy we have exactly the sort of government we deserve, because were the ones that keep putting these people back in power.



posted by: littlemrmahatma (reply)
post date: 02.27.07 (7:51 pm)

Points all too well made.

Your Name:


Your Comment:


More Links:

POLITICS:
Arianna
FactCheck.ORG not .COM
SpinSanity
Black Box Voting
OpenSecrets
Open The Government
AntiWar
Americans United for Separation of Church and State
Church of Critical Thinking
The New Enlightenment
Mother Jones
Reuters
Pravda

RELIGION:
Secular Web - Atheism
Skeptic's Annotated Bible and annotated Koran.
The Happy Heretic
Fallacies
The Skeptic's Dictionary
God of the Month
Religion Selector