Once again the Bush logic is terribly wrong. (If challenged the Bush Administration would probably say that the flunkie didn't understand the topic well enough to comment properly - always blame someone else!) Let's examine this.

While many Americans earnings over $200,000 may own businesses, many do not. For those who don't how can they increase the number of jobs? They can't! For those who do own businesses it's highly unlikely that they are sole proprietors (meaning the person is essentially the business) therefore a taxcut for the person has no influence on the business. None! Zilch! Nada! Again, a tax cut for a person has absolutely no bearing on a business that employs that person. A CEO getting a massive tax cut isn't going to go to work and spend HIS money on hiring more employees. It doesn't happen that way.

And look at this. Even with Bush's tax cut the number of jobs hasn't increased. Bush will still show an Administration overall loss of jobs. There is no relationship between personal tax cuts and job hiring.

But Bush quite recently did give a massive tax cut for businesses and that should influence jobs, right? More money for the company, more hiring - that's what Bush says so it must be true. Except it isn't true. A company receiving an influx of money from a tax cut has many choices as to what to do with it. Here's some options: