 Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2008 September
2008 March
2007 August
2007 July
2007 February
2007 January
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January
My Links
Little Miss Attila
Dr. Forbush Thinks
Slashdot
Games Slashdot
User Friendly
James Randi
Snopes
Home of the Underdogs
The Sun Online
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
In which the middle-aged Peacenik mouths off about War Drones--and all the other things that make him cranky. Pnorny!
Mr Mahatma--who is a Mr in real life--lives in the valleys of Southern California with his wife, a herd of Dears, and an impressive collection of books. He is reachable at: littlemrmahatma@yahoo.com
All writings are copyrighted 2003-2008 and trademarked: Little Mr. Mahatma
Blogger Main Site
Still More Links:

Blogarama-Review My Site
IceRocket
LS Blogs
Blog Universe
|
| Fighting Terrorism |
| 02.24.05 (8:35 am) [edit] |
The devil is in the details or the fine print. When reading the below it's hard not to think how this could be abused. Note that it never mentions what would happen if a "rescue group" entered a country (illegally) and got caught. Or what's to keep such a group from...umm...assassinating a hostile leader, which is entirely possible given the broad definition of terrorism. More importantly, if we have this policy what's to keep other countries from declaring a similar policy? If our terrorist policy allows to pre-emptively invade a country and covertly operate, other countries should be able to operate in the same fashion. Now, what happens if the U.S. is declared a terrorist nation? Yep, shit hits fan. But expect this stupid plan to pass; logic, consequences, and morality be damned.
Pentagon Seeking Leeway Overseas
By Ann Scott Tyson and Dana Priest, Washington Post Staff Writers
The Pentagon is promoting a global counterterrorism plan that would allow Special Operations forces to enter a foreign country to conduct military operations without explicit concurrence from the U.S. ambassador there, administration officials familiar with the plan said.
The plan would weaken the long-standing "chief of mission" authority under which the U.S. ambassador, as the president's top representative in a foreign country, decides whether to grant entry to U.S. government personnel based on political and diplomatic considerations.
The Special Operations missions envisioned in the plan would largely be secret, known to only a handful of officials from the foreign country, if any.
The change is included in a highly classified "execute order" -- part of a broad strategy developed since Sept. 11, 2001, to give the U.S. Special Operations Command new flexibility to track down and destroy terrorist networks worldwide, the officials said.
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
|
More Links:
POLITICS:
Arianna
FactCheck.ORG not .COM
SpinSanity
Black Box Voting
OpenSecrets
Open The Government
AntiWar
Americans United for Separation of Church and State
Church of Critical Thinking
The New Enlightenment
Mother Jones
Reuters
Pravda
RELIGION:
Secular Web - Atheism
Skeptic's Annotated Bible and annotated Koran.
The Happy Heretic
Fallacies
The Skeptic's Dictionary
God of the Month
Religion Selector
|