Marriage Redefined

Ravings from the Frothy Middle


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 September
2008 March
2007 August
2007 July
2007 February
2007 January
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
Little Miss Attila
Dr. Forbush Thinks
Slashdot
Games Slashdot
User Friendly
James Randi
Snopes
Home of the Underdogs
The Sun Online

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


In which the middle-aged Peacenik mouths off about War Drones--and all the other things that make him cranky. Pnorny!

Mr Mahatma--who is a Mr in real life--lives in the valleys of Southern California with his wife, a herd of Dears, and an impressive collection of books. He is reachable at: littlemrmahatma@yahoo.com

All writings are copyrighted 2003-2008 and trademarked: Little Mr. Mahatma

Blogger Main Site


Still More Links:

Listed on BlogShares

Blogarama - The Blog Directory
Blogarama-Review My Site

IceRocket

LS Blogs

Blog Universe

Search For Blogs, Submit Blogs, The Ultimate Blog Directory

Blog Directory & Search engine

Site Meter


Marriage Redefined
02.10.04 (11:10 am)   [edit]
In a previous post about marriage I proposed a new definition of marriage: "Marriage is a legitimate union between consenting adults." but after a nights sleep I realized that the new definition might be too progressive for most people. For by the definition polygamy and group marriages would be allowed. That might be too much of a societal jump so here's the revised version: "Marriage is a legitimate union between two consenting adults.". Better? And by the way there's really is nothing wrong with polygamy and group marriages in theory IF the "consenting adults" part of the definition is met. That means, no shotgun marriages or marriages necessitated by unplanned progeny. If a group of consenting adults want to jointly marry, let them, as long as they understand the legal benefits and consequences thereof.


How would we check consent? One thought would be the County Clerk has all potential Marries sign the marriage certificate individually without the other(s) present. They sign after swearing under oath that they choose marriage from their own free will without coercion. Also, the Marries would not be allowed to sign while under the influence of any drugs particularly alcohol - we'll call this the Britney Clause. Perhaps making it a little tougher to get a marriage license instead of easier would reduce the divorce rate and restore the sanctity of such a union.

 


posted by: Octo6er (reply)
post date: 02.10.04 (11:12 am)

Good definition



posted by: therealspartacus007 (reply)
post date: 02.10.04 (1:52 pm)

Why two consenting adults? Many cultures recognize polygamy.



posted by: greeneyedgrrl (reply)
post date: 02.10.04 (4:51 pm)

Baby steps to enlightenment.....

Your Name:


Your Comment:


More Links:

POLITICS:
Arianna
FactCheck.ORG not .COM
SpinSanity
Black Box Voting
OpenSecrets
Open The Government
AntiWar
Americans United for Separation of Church and State
Church of Critical Thinking
The New Enlightenment
Mother Jones
Reuters
Pravda

RELIGION:
Secular Web - Atheism
Skeptic's Annotated Bible and annotated Koran.
The Happy Heretic
Fallacies
The Skeptic's Dictionary
God of the Month
Religion Selector